LAST NIGHT:
McCain: “He has voted in the United States Senate to increase taxes on people who make as low as $42,000.”
THE FACTS: OBAMA DID NOT VOTE TO RAISE TAXES ON FAMILIES MAKING $42,000 A YEAR
Fact Check.org: Claim That Obama Would Have Raised Taxes On “Families” Making $42,000 Is “Simply False.” “A Spanish-language radio ad claims the measure Obama supported would have raised taxes on ‘families’ making $42,000, which is simply false. Even a single mother with one child would have been able to make $58,650 without being affected. A family of four with income up to $90,000 would not have been affected.” [FactCheck.org, 8/8/08]
Washington Post: McCain’s Attack On Obama For Voting To “Raise Taxes On People Making Just $42,000″ Is “Unacceptably Misleading.” “Barack Obama and John McCain have important differences on tax policy. These are fair game for campaign ads, and no one expects 30-second spots to be suffused with nuance. But Mr. McCain’s latest attack on the Obama tax plan crosses the line from reasonable argument to unacceptably misleading. ‘Obama voted to raise taxes on people making just $42,000,’ the announcer warns. The basis for this statement is the senator’s vote for the fiscal 2009 budget resolution, a nonbinding blueprint that assumed that all the Bush tax cuts would expire as scheduled. However, Mr. Obama has repeatedly said he wants to extend the Bush tax cuts for families making less than $250,000 a year. If anything, he has lavished too much in tax breaks on the middle class, proposing an expensive $1,000-per-family additional tax credit and, last weekend, piling on top of that an immediate, presumably one-time, $1,000-per-family rebate for energy costs.” [Editorial, Washington Post, 8/10/08]
Factcheck.org: Over 95% Of Households With Children Would Get A Tax Cut Under Obama’s Plan. “In fact, an analysis of the candidates’ tax plans by the Urban Institute-Brookings Tax Policy Center found that 95.5 percent of households with children would get a tax cut under Obama’s plan.” [Factcheck.org, 9/24/08]
OBAMA’s PLAN PROVIDES A BIGGER TAX CUT FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS THAN MCCAIN AND MCCAIN’s TAX CUT LEAVES OUT 101 MILLION MIDDLE CLASS FAMILIES AND 37 MILLION SENIORS
Obama’s Plan Would Cut Taxes On The Middle Class Three To Almost Eight Times More Than McCain’s Would. “But when it comes to promises, it’s worth pointing out that, according to the non-partisan Tax Policy Center’s analysis of both candidates’ proposed plans, Obama would cut taxes for those making in the range of $38,000 to $66,000 three to almost eight times more than McCain would.” [MSNBC, "First Read," 8/8/08]
McCain’s Plan To Cut Taxes Leaves Out 101 Million Middle Class Households. “McCain’s plan is tilted toward corporations and the most affluent, neglects middle-class Americans and lacks immediate solutions, Obama’s advisers said today in a conference call with reporters held to unveil a report critical of the Arizona senator’s proposals. . McCain’s plan to cut taxes for the middle class by increasing the dependent exemption leaves out 101 million households without children, according to Obama’s report. His plan gives tax cuts to the nation’s wealthiest 2 percent and to large corporations, the report said.” [Bloomberg, 7/6/08; IRS Tax Stats; Tax Policy Center, Preliminary Analysis Of The 2008 Presidential Candidates' Tax Plan, 6/20/08]








3 users commented in " Mccain’s Tax Lie - Obama Did Not Vote To Raise Taxes On Families Making $42,000 A Year "
Follow-up comment rss or Leave a TrackbackFor all the pontificating above, the claim is factually correct, and arguably correct in spirit as well. Obama did vote (at least twice) for Democratic Budget Resolutions that would have raised taxes on individuals making $42,000. And as to responses like:
“but Obama has said multiple times he won’t raise taxes on individuals making under $250k”, the whole point is, talk is cheap (and at various times in the last year, Obama has favored policies that would strongly violate that.) In practice, Obama did in fact vote to raise taxes on people making $42k.
Obama’s tax plan will destroy the Social Security system.
Obama says his income tax plan will lower taxes for 95% of Americans. There is just one problem with this, 40% of Americans already pay no income tax. Obama’s response to this is that these people pay Social Security tax. Well, that’s not income tax, but a contribution to their retirement plan. So if he wins and implements his tax plan, for the first time in the history of Social Security, 40% of the people who will get retirement benefits will have paid nothing for them. Social Security will then loose all pretext of being a retirement plan, and will become a national welfare program.
This will cause Social Security to lose public support in a massive way. Leave Social Security contributions out of income tax plans. If you take some peoples income taxes to pay others Social Security taxes, Social Security will be destroyed forever.
http://strategicthought-charles77.blogspot.com/2008/10/obamas-tax-plan-will-destroy-social.html
95% of working families.
Also, FICA is factored from income, so, it is, in fact, a tax based on income. The quickest way to fix any perceived problem with Social Security is to raise the FICA caps.
It’s not intellectually dishonest to raise the FICA cap and then revise the percentages on the lower field on income earners.
I’m self employed. My FICA input raises my tax rate from around 17% (including state and everything else) to around 28 - 32% of total income depending on if I had a good year or not.
I can’t make ends meet on a very moderate life for me and my family before taxes, so, a downward adjustment to my income AND FICA taxes is very beneficial to me and I’m really looking forward to it.
However, if I made 250,000 a year, that 30%, give or take, would still leave me with plenty to make ends meet.
I fail to see the problem. I failed to see it when I was making the kind of money that would be seeing a rise in my taxes. If I make more, there’s no reason my percentages should drop lower than those who make a lot less than I do/did.
It’s not a dollar amount to me because “fair share” can only be factored as fair with a percentage matrix rather than a dollar amount.
Leave A Reply