<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IMHO &#8211; Senate will kill Health Reform 60 &#8211; 40</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jmbell.org/blog/2009/11/09/imho-senate-will-kill-health-reform-60-40/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jmbell.org/blog/2009/11/09/imho-senate-will-kill-health-reform-60-40/</link>
	<description>THE BLOG - Always On Message</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:33:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ronald D. Hunt</title>
		<link>http://jmbell.org/blog/2009/11/09/imho-senate-will-kill-health-reform-60-40/comment-page-1/#comment-91030</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronald D. Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmbell.org/blog/?p=4416#comment-91030</guid>
		<description>bet yea 50+vp to 52 votes in a reconciliation vote pass atleast the PO and the subsidies. Its not worth using the nuclear option for this bill. Now single payer that would be good reason to go nuclear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bet yea 50+vp to 52 votes in a reconciliation vote pass atleast the PO and the subsidies. Its not worth using the nuclear option for this bill. Now single payer that would be good reason to go nuclear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rmwarnick</title>
		<link>http://jmbell.org/blog/2009/11/09/imho-senate-will-kill-health-reform-60-40/comment-page-1/#comment-91027</link>
		<dc:creator>rmwarnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmbell.org/blog/?p=4416#comment-91027</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/11/there_are_many_events_in.php#more?ref=fpblg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Josh Marshall&lt;/a&gt; offers a more hopeful prospect for the America’s Affordable Health Choice Act of 2009:

&lt;i&gt;    The precise contours of the post-conference legislation remains uncertain in a number of key respects, especially in regards to the public option. But having watched the events leading up to the House vote and the politicking in the senate, I have little doubt that a broadly similar bill will pass the senate, be reconciled with the House bill in a conference report and bill that will be signed by the president in relatively short order.

    The reason these sorts of events happen so infrequently is that they are like colossal ships or vast armies, very difficult to build or assemble and get on their way but also extremely difficult to stop or turn once they are under way. &lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2009/11/there_are_many_events_in.php#more?ref=fpblg" rel="nofollow">Josh Marshall</a> offers a more hopeful prospect for the America’s Affordable Health Choice Act of 2009:</p>
<p><i>    The precise contours of the post-conference legislation remains uncertain in a number of key respects, especially in regards to the public option. But having watched the events leading up to the House vote and the politicking in the senate, I have little doubt that a broadly similar bill will pass the senate, be reconciled with the House bill in a conference report and bill that will be signed by the president in relatively short order.</p>
<p>    The reason these sorts of events happen so infrequently is that they are like colossal ships or vast armies, very difficult to build or assemble and get on their way but also extremely difficult to stop or turn once they are under way. </i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
